首页> 外文OA文献 >Social democracy in the 21st century: still a class act? The place of class in Jospinism and Blairism
【2h】

Social democracy in the 21st century: still a class act? The place of class in Jospinism and Blairism

机译:21世纪的社会民主:仍然是阶级行为吗?班级在约斯派和布莱尔主义中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article explores the enduring relevance (or otherwise) of class to social democracy through comparative analysis of the British Labour Party and the French Socialist Party (PS - Parti Socialiste ) at the beginning of the 21st century. It first considers the elite-level conception of class, and perceptions of its place within each party's identity and political economy. The second section explores the importance of class to electoral strategy. Significant differences emerge in the importance attached to class by each party. New Labour has expunged class from its analysis of the economy and the electorate, but paradoxically owes its success to a cross-class electoral alliance. Conversely, the PS now seems firmly camped on social democratic territory it until recently shunned, retaining an emphasis on class, yet its cross-class electoral alliance appears more fragile, given the context of party competition in France. Both parties, however, illustrate the increasingly uncertain relationship between class and post-golden age social democracy.
机译:本文通过对21世纪初的英国工党和法国社会党(PS-Parti Socialiste)进行比较分析,探讨了阶级与社会民主主义之间的持久相关性。它首先考虑了精英阶层的阶级概念,以及对阶级在每个政党的身份和政治经济中的地位的看法。第二部分探讨了阶级对选举策略的重要性。各方对阶级的重视程度出现了显着差异。 《新工党》从对经济和选民的分析中减少了阶级,但自相矛盾的是,它的成功归功于跨阶级的选举联盟。相反,PS似乎牢固地扎根于它直到最近才回避的社会民主领地上,继续强调阶级,但考虑到法国政党竞争的背景,其跨阶级的选举联盟显得更加脆弱。但是,双方都说明了阶级与后黄金时代社会民主之间的关系越来越不确定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Clift, Ben;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号